Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />Zoning File #1636 <br />April 11, 1991 <br />Page 4 of 5 <br />2. Excessive hardcover within the 72~250* setback area. <br />The existing paved drive brings the property up to 37.4% <br />hardcover. Review staff's sketch (Exhibit M). Staff has <br />sketched in areas of drive that could be removed and still <br />function resulting in a reduction of 600 s.f. or 4.4% <br />hardcover. Note also that there is a landscape area under­ <br />lain with plastic at 115.5 s.f. or .85%. Can the same <br />findings be made for the current hardcover variance <br />application as was made in the variance application of 1966 <br />(review Exhibit 0)? Please be prepared to respond to this <br />issue. <br />3. Issue of deck constructed without building permit <br />authority. In 1985/86 deck would have been approved at 3.1* <br />setback. Would such action have been in conflict with <br />intent of Resolution #1718-8? The decks would not have <br />created hardcover excesses because porous blocks were to be <br />used for drive (hardcover was at 19%). Both decks would not <br />have required other setback variance. <br />Options of Action - <br />Denial. Please refer to the necessary findings section in <br />your zoning code; or <br />Approval as proposed and require applicant to obtain <br />necessary building permits to cover lakeside and street-side <br />decks. Building permit to include penalty fee. <br />Conditional approval of application as proposed subject to <br />applicant obtaining building permit for lakeside and street side <br />decks# to include penalty fee, and the granting of a hardcover <br />variance of % and a setback variance of _ _' or % for <br />street deck based on one or more of the f ol lowing; <br />1. Approval or disapproval of lakeside deck as built. <br />2. Approval of street-side deck: <br />A. at current location; or <br />B. to be alterated to meet 10* setback; <br />C. other. <br />3. Excessive hardcover at 37.4%.