My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-22-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
04-22-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2024 11:33:42 AM
Creation date
6/10/2024 11:26:19 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
761
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
■tv <br />V <br />& <br />P' <br />W:i‘ <br />w <br />ir <br />fife <br />0'/.' <br />'3fe <br />-4 <br />HS <br />H-! <br />^5- <br />i;i-^ <br />r‘.‘v <br />•Tt <br />^L^.. <br />q-'V • <br />m'^. <br />iM- <br />Zoning File #1634 April 9, 1991 Pago 2 of 3The property was subdivided in approximately 1977 and at the time was soned R-IA, 5 acre minimum dry contiguous. The property <br />was recently rezoned with the Landmark subdivision application and <br />is now zoned LR-IA, 2 acre minimum lot density. <br />Applicant notes the following hardships: <br />1, Interior layout/design - applicants have been asked to <br />submit interior plans to support hardship {this will not be <br />included in your Wednesday packet). Applicants' consultant <br />has advised that they will be able to make the Friday packet <br />deadline. <br />2. Architectural design of the structure would be destroyed <br />if located at any other side of the house. <br />Staff would add the following: <br />3. The location of the house on the property does not meet <br />either 5 acre (50' side) or 2 acre (30* side) zoning <br />standards• <br />4. Lakeside addition would destroy not only the design* but <br />would allow the structure to encroach further into the <br />average lakeshore setback area. <br />S. Expansion to west is restricted because of existing septic <br />system. <br />6. Structure will encroach no <br />structure to the side lot line. <br />closer than the existing <br />Nr. Heckman's memo and septic inventory map (Exhibits H and <br />I) confirm that the proposed addition will not inpact the <br />existing septic system nor burden the existing system with <br />increased use. Weckman does caution if the loft area is <br />converted to a legal bedroom, the septic system would have to be <br />evaluated at that time. <br />The addition at a maximum height of 21*i* meets the allowed <br />It requiresMnt of 30*. <br />Qptiemm of Aetion - <br />Denial. If denied, pi <br />your seeing codei or <br />ifer to the necessary findings in <br />I <br />i St.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.