Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR AUGUST 17,1998 <br />! i <br />(#2395 BRENT BENTROTT, Continued) <br />width to maintain an adequate bench of three to one for safety and mowing. <br />Stoddaixl commented the steep embankment might requite retaining walis, which would also increase <br />hardcover. <br />would probably vote against this application with the proposed hardcover. <br />Van Zomeren stated that the new hardcover numbers were not provided with the revised plan. <br />Chair Smith stated the Planning Commission probably cannot act on this application without the new <br />hardcover numbers. <br />Sloddaid stated the surveyor or Applicant should be notified by City Staff that hardcover needs to be <br />calculated before the meeting. <br />Mrs. Bentrott stated they would like to relocate the garage closer <br />relation the ability to visit them year-round, noting they werent aware they couldr.t relocate the <br />garage. <br />Mr. Bentrott slated Bruce Vang, building inspector, has been out to view'''« <br />suggestions to utilize the platted, unopened street and to construct a new garage because in his view <br />the existing garage was a hazard since they had to back out onto the street. <br />Stoddard stated it has not been the philosphy of the Planning fo*review the <br />platted, unopened street for private driveways. Stoddard stated Planning <br />Mssible need for retaining walls, amount of fill, and new hardcover numbers, noting the Planning <br />Commission cannot act on this application until those issues are addressed. <br />Berg expressed concerns over the driveway being close to the neighboring house and the impact the <br />noise and headlights would have on the adjoining property. <br />Schroeder suggested tabling the application to allow the Bentrotts time to address these issues. <br />Chair Smith stated she would prefer a plan without retaining walls if possible, and suggested the <br />Applicant continue to work with City Staff on the hardcover and engineering issues. <br />Mr. Bentrott stated they applied for the vacation to eliminate setback for the three-season porch. <br />Hawn stated the vacation probably would not be approved. <br />Mr Bentrott staled in his opinion he has three options; 1) keep existing garage; 2) lll^irh Is <br />application without the ten foot vacation of Bluff Street, and 3) proceed wrih the revised plan, which is <br />the most costly. <br />Hawn remarked in her view those options are not viable due to the increased hardcover. <br />Schroeder suggested tabling the mailer, noting he is not prepared to give guidance on this application <br />due to the engineering issues that need to be addressed. <br />Stoddard suggested the Appiicani continue to work with City Staff in an effort to resolve some of <br />Page 6