Laserfiche WebLink
9. <br />10. <br />The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, <br />comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />The granting of variances would not be a public hazard or contrary to the intent of the Zoning <br />Code. <br />The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The variances from lot coverage and allowed hardcover do not appear to have a <br />demonstratable hardship due to the lots ability to accommodate a residence that would meet <br />Zoning Code requirements. <br />The variance to allow the accessory structure (boathouse) to remain without a principal <br />structure coula be interpreted as a hardship as the structure has been on the property before <br />the adoption of the Zoning Code. <br />Issues <br />1. <br />2. <br />The applicants are requesting three variances (hardcover within the 75-250' lakeshore <br />setback and lot coverage to exceed 15.0%) and a third for an accessory structure to remain <br />on the lot without a principal structure. <br />The accessory structure would only remain on the lot without a principal structure during <br />the demolition and reconstruction period. <br />3. All required setback and yard areas are met. <br />4.The lot is sewered and under one acre allowing lot width and lot area to only meet 80% of <br />requirements. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Staff recommends approval of the variance for an accessory structure to remain on the <br />property without a principal structure. <br />Staff recommends denial of the variances for structural coverage and hardcover within 75- <br />250' of the lakeshore as a result of no apparent hardships. <br />U2406 Gerald and Sandra Erickson <br />26S3 Casco Point Road <br />y\*fiances <br />Pag! 5