My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
11-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:54:11 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:47:58 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
319
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2341 - Little Orchard Easement <br />November 6,1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Easement Relocation vs. Variance <br />At the October 26 meeting 1 indicated that a compromise was likely possible in regards to the <br />easement location. Council has the ability to redefine the easement boundary wherever you see fit; <br />however, you cannot arbitrarily establish the 'top of the bluff at a location other than the technically <br />correct location arrived at based on the code definition. Therefore, placement of the house at a <br />location less than 30 ’ from the defined 'top of bluff would require a variance regardless of where you <br />choose to locate the easement boundaiy. <br />If the final proposed house location requires a variance for setback from top of bluff. Council may <br />wish to indicate to applicant w hether a variance would be granted if a hardship is shown. <br />As of my site inspection with Kyle Hunt at 9:00 a.m. on November 6 the house was staked as shown <br />on Exhibit A. The technically correct 'top of bluff is not shown on Exhibit A nor was it staked <br />in the field this morning. This proposed house location jeapordizes the 36" oak tree as well as the <br />two maplesf?) that are close together. This location also requires a variance to the bluff setback <br />based on staffs top-of-bluff depiction. Mr. Hunt agreed that the house should shift to better protect <br />the trees. He indicated he may be submitting a revised plan from that staked in the field. That plan <br />has not been submitted as of this w ritinu, but may arrive in time to include in this packet. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />The bluff setback issue is difficult to deal with, since a variance for new construction will require <br />a Council conclusion that a hardship exists. Council should visit the site with Mr. Hunt to visualize <br />the impacts the house location w ill have on existing trees, and to help you in determining whether <br />a variance application might meet with success. <br />Staff recommends that an easement be retained that will meet the City's tree preservation goals. It <br />is not necessary that the easement boundaiy match the technically defined 30' top of bluff setback <br />line, but it should not be downhill from that line. It should be located at least 10' from any trees you <br />want protected. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Review the new^ information and provide staff with direction as to relocation of the easement <br />boundary.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.