Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Date: <br />Item No. <br />COUNCIL MiLb I i.w <br />MOV Q <br />CITYCFORCNO <br />November 6,1998 <br />// <br />Department Approval: <br />Name: Michael P. Gaffron ''7^ <br />Title: Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2341 - Dan Anderson - Lot 5, Little Orchard <br />Request to Revise Easement Legal Description <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Proposed House Location Sketch (As staked as of 11-6-98 9:00 am) <br />B - Overlay onto Staff Easement Proposal of 10-23-98 <br />C- " " Surveyor ................................. <br />D - Technically Correct "Top of Bluff and 30' Setback Line <br />E - Memo and Exhibits of October 23, 1998 <br />October 26 Council Action <br />On October 26 Council reviewed the information provided by staff and the developer regarding the <br />location of the existing easement boundary in relation to the defined 'top of bluff. Council tabled <br />the request for two weeks in order that the developer could stake the site to depict the proposed <br />house location in relation to the top of bluff, with the intent that Council members visit the site prior <br />to the next meeting. <br />Where is the Top of Bluff? <br />Exhibit D depicts the technically correct "top of bluff location in staffs opinion. The critical points <br />were located based on the new topographic survey and slopes calculated by m'^asuring between each <br />contour line along the cross section. This exhibit also show s the technically correct location of the <br />30’ setback from "top of bluff . <br />Staff does not agree with the surveyor ’s depictions of "top of bluff shown in Exhibits A and C and <br />staked in the field today, because they do not reflect the slopes between individual contours and <br />appear to have gaps in information at certain critical points. <br />The difference between staffs "lop of bluff and 30’ bluff setback depiction, and that of the <br />applicant's sur\'eyor, is significant, ranging from as little as less than a foot to nearly 18 feet. <br />Unfortunately, the greatest difference occurs where it has a severe impact on the proposed house <br />location.