Laserfiche WebLink
• V- ■r-':-'.it V <br />/ M <br />Planning Cooalsaion and Ccuncil <br />Jaanna A. Mabuath, Aaat. Zoning AdaiaxatrMtor. <br />. * > .\ ■ t <br />Deceiobar 21, 197S <br />v448 Jatteo K. Lindoay, 2505 Kelly Avaaua <br />r-^/ <br />» *r< ; <br />f <br />1 <br />r • i <br />SK2VCK PLA^ RSVIEV; <br />*v. <br />uuu -*« ___coopleto and vill ba mvievcd b«for«'na^’ <br />presentation. The setbacks for oxiacins buildings on lAts .1 «nd;2"* ^ <br />satlsf^ccory but Che duplex on Ix)C 3 will re<iuire. • <br />rear yard setback. <br />• '•'cV*.’. ■'■' <br />Access road - The existing driveway wxll appear as a privatevKOSd. - <br />^ _ _ __ _ _ O * . * V. 'easement serving Lots 1 and 2.. .„v. <br />•V <tJv * ;•■ <br />Wetland - The wetland at tlie northwest comer of parcel has not iMSa <br />designated on plan. We will require a conservation and <br />fiowage easement over the wetland. •' <br />Riparian rii^hts - Tne applicant requests a joint dock for Mch lot^ <br />*“ (cne dock serving two dwelling units). If Planning <br />CotTinission approves^ then a variance to the Flood <br />Plain - Wetlands knnagement Ordinance oust be given <br />(similar to one Issued for the Farm at lx)ng Lake <br />and Victoria Graon). Lot 1 is involved; Lot 2 <br />appears to have 15*-20* of available ^akeshore but <br />the setback request of 10' will take roost of it, <br />and Lot 3 would not be involved. <br />Staff recommends a private outlot over the existing <br />dock area. This alternative will lessen the Impact <br />on wetland and dismiss the need for a variance. <br />Rear yard setback varlnnco - Ordinance 34.450 <br />Required: <br />Proposed: <br />Variance: <br />30' <br />24' - SOX <br />• ^ <br />•\r: t <br />• •*. <br />••• •••.. ...