My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
581
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
II <br />••Am « <br />«913 Paul Phillips <br />Paqt; 2 <br />June 21, liPS <br />Tho County liiohwny Oepartnent has approved the access location for the <br />future private road. The Coirprehensivc Plan has classified County <br />Uoad e as a RL.ior arterial road with an 80* riqht of way width. TheCity <br />oust deny the County's r*nuest for on additional 10' of riqht of way <br />providinq for a to»>al 100* riqht of way. <br />Septic <br />All lots have suitable areas for both principal and alternate on site <br />septic systems. Staff recommends berminq, ditchinq or ano*^hcr <br />approved technique to prevent drainaqe from future road beinq directed <br />to nound areas on Lot 1. Future road construction and drainuqu fr€>m <br />t.!0 roaci if not properly desiqnec! will crootc iKsijot problems tor tho <br />septi” system. Staff strongly suggests the bermine at the time tho <br />s«.ptic system is constructed because the existence of the berm during <br />road construction will serve to protect or flag the septic area. If <br />ditching or anothrr means is to be provided at the time of future road <br />construction, the septic area could easily be destroyed by a <br />contractor unfamiliar with the situation. Tho important thing for <br />tho developer to realize is thaw there mvy not bo another suitable <br />uepti«; area on this lot if the t»‘ji?etl area is destroyed. <br />Drainaqe Concerns <br />There are nodesiqrated wetlands within the area of the pla-. Staff's <br />cor.c»*rns center within Lot 1. Review Fxhibit P. The shared lot line <br />:.-*weon l^ts 1 and 2 has. b'-i.n adjusteti to provi«!c Lot 1 more high dry <br />qrcund within the building cnvolope. <br />•hv flat topoqmmphy, high water table, and soils makeup place <br />testraints on t|ie buildlpq envelope. Lot 1 contains a drainage tilt <br />»nat carries rniiof f to tho northeast underground via Lot 3. ThistiK <br />l ir.e mu^be looted and designated as a drainage *'asement on the f i nal <br />.?***•.*** *^*-** the, tllo is at the 1005.S elevation, the first <br />nabita.«le floog of tho rgstdence structure must be two feet above th« <br />e.evai ion at 1M7.5*. tefore final plat approval, the City Znglneai <br />'.hould detemiAe if there is a need to also ask for drainage easementi <br />.:roiifid t ne area of the inlet witb.n I.ot !. Please note Lot 1 alrca<b <br />.icres ir. ^ Th.* <ippl irar.t's engir.*»er has also cor. f i rr;*.**" <br />'.'..It drainage from read flows to south side of Highway 12 and doy - .o- <br />o*.ay within Lot I. There is a natural berm or hump in the topog: i{.h- <br />i» fror flcwi: i rvr Lr» I *o dt.iinaqe rilo. <br />iM.itttii rif| Commission Recommer-dat ion '"P" <br />N <br />• • • . j I : • V.: • :•' ** • / 5 • F* • 4 ** » < T, <br />* t*;*- . n /*,:..• *! :' s* : . • • <br />r*, .*• * • • , • <br />*••••• • • <br />f.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.