My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
581
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i- <br />Date of Application: 9/23/98 [Sketch Plan Review] <br />Date Complete: 10/23/98 <br />60 day limit: 12/23/98 <br />Access <br />Currently the parcel shares a driveway with the adjacent residence at 2160 Sixth Avenue North. <br />Driveways may serve two residences. Three residences should be served by an outlot with a <br />private road agreement. If an outlot or private road where created, the property at 216u Sixth <br />Avenue North would have frontage on a road. It currently does not have frontage on any street. <br />Under current regulations, 2160 Sixth Avenue North could not be created. The subdivision of <br />this parcel and the requirement for a private road could potentially eliminate a "landlocked" parcel <br />served by a private driveway easement. <br />The consultant engineer has provided a letter in Exhibit C that addresses concerns the existing <br />driveway. <br />Setbacks <br />If the residence at 2140 Sixth Avenue North becomes a backlot under the proposed plan, it will <br />be subject to greater setback requirements and will become non-conforming as to the east side <br />yard setback requirements. This could impact future property owner's ability to make changes <br />to the residence by requiring variances. <br />Septic <br />The propose septic plan is acceptable. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: <br />The Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan according to the current regulations. Because <br />it is a sketch plan, no action was taken, however, they advised the applicant and staff that the City <br />Council should review the sketch plan application. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: <br />To direct the applicant regarding the proposed sketch plan. <br />Attachments <br />Staff Report to PC <br />A Application <br />B Plat map <br />C Engineer's letter <br />^11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.