10-26-1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16,1996 G-i (#3 - #2169"^chael Renard - Continued) Lindquist asked what the hardcover facts were. Mabusth asked for a breakdown of the hardcover calculations and whether it included the landscaping. BepJ^howed the survey to Mabusth, who did not have a copy of this particular survey. E^^ussion was had on the particulars of the hardcover. It was determined that if the 130of landscape rock in the 0-75' war removed, along with 420 s.f in the 75-250' setbac)(?fthere would be no need for a hardcover variance. Schroeder said he was concerned \Yith trading of plastic and rock as *. _ ___ ^ ^ • •• • • •it should not have been there in the first place. The plastic was instadled by a previous owner. Schroeder said the'hardcover should be sepai^ed showing what does and does not coun*.. Mabusth said it w/ould not be required i^nere was no hardcover variance required in the 75-250' setbaclc and would only involve the average lakeshore setback. Schroeder questioned whether this was actuall^^lmown. Mabusth clarified that the hardcover total was originally 6142 s.f. or 26/7% where 5707 s.f. is allowed. With the removal of the 420 s.f. of landscape rock apo plastic, the square footage of hardcover would be at 24.9% and not require a variance. Smith asked why the shed was an issye in 1991. Mabusth said it was because the hardcover exceeded the allowed at 26.7^4. With the shed removal, the hardcover would be at 25.5%. / \ \There were no public commej^ts. Schroeder said he was relufc^ant to allow the shed since the Council in 1991 recommended its removal with the sanje basic numbers presented. Lindquist noted that the structure was proposed larger at that'time. Mabusth said there Was also more hardcover and the updated survey was riot available. Mabusth said the removal of plastic and rock would result in a 1.8% reduction from 26.7% to 24.9%. Lindquist move^ Hawn seconded, to recommend appr^’al of Application #2169 with the understanding/hat all plastic on the property would be ren^ved along with the cement le 0-75' setback. The application would only involve a variance to the m mm m A ^ pad located m the 0-75'-------- --------------- average lak«hore setback, and the shed would be allowed td'remain. Vote: Ayes 6, Nays ^ ^---------------------------------------------------..........................................................................* ............................................. •.0. (#4) #2159 JAMES AND JOANN JUNDT, 1400 BRACKETTS POINT ROAD - VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:30-7:54 P.M. The Applicant was present.I Gaffron reported that the application was tabled at the request of the applicant at the August 19 meeting of the Planning Commission. He noted that the application has been revised by the withdrawal of the boathouse from the application. I