My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
581
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 3 Q 8 6____ <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />A.The property is unique for a number of reasons, including its age, its <br />history and the fact that applicants have been diligently restoring the <br />property to its former splendor. <br />B.The proposed wo^k involves restoration of amenities or structures which <br />already exist, and does not propose any new buildings or amenities. <br />C.The 650 ’ length of the eastern shoreline justifies the existence of as many <br />as four lakeshore stairways to provide access to the lake from the higher <br />portions of the property which are as much as 25' above lake level, and <br />the steep slopes east of the house suggest the need for stairway access. <br />On October 20, 1997 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed this request for <br />variance renewal and on a vote of 6*0 recommended approval, finding that the <br />findings and conditions of the prior approval as noted in Resolution No. 3786 <br />are still valid and appropriate. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to othei property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />ser\e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City'. <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.