My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
581
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />8. <br />A.The property is unique for a number of reas jus, including its age, its <br />history and the fact that applicants have been dilii.sntly restoring the <br />property to its former splendor. <br />B.The proposed work involves restoration of amenities or structures which <br />already exist, and docs not propose any new buildings or amenities. <br />C.The 650' length of the eastern shoreline justifies tii*; existence of as many <br />as four lakeshore stairways to provide access to the iake from the higher <br />portions of the property which are as much as 25' above lake level, and <br />the steep slopes east of the house suggest the need for stairway access. <br />The City Council on October 28, 1996 adopted Resolution No. 3786 granting <br />approval of the requested variances. <br />Pursuant to request by the applicant and upon recommendation oy the Planning <br />Commission, or October 27, 1997 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 3986 <br />renewing approval of the requested variances. <br />On October 19, 1998 the Orono Planning Commission reviewed the current <br />request for variance renewal and on a vote of 4-0 recommended approval, <br />finding that the findings and conditions of the prior approvals as noted in <br />Resolutions No. 3786 and No. 3986 are still valid and appropriate. <br />The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br />recommendations of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments <br />by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br />welfare of the community. <br />The City Council finds thai; conditions existing on this property are peculiar <br />U it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variances would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; w-ould not merely <br />seiA'e as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />Page 2 of 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.