Laserfiche WebLink
Structural Coverag e <br />Total Lot Size <br />6,860 + 1,060=7,940 sq. ft. <br />Approved Structural <br />Coverage <br />(1979) <br />1,925.32 sq. ft. <br />(24.24%) <br />Allowed <br />Structural <br />Coverage <br />1,191 sq. ft. <br />(15%) <br />Existing <br />Structural <br />Coverage <br />2,084.34 sq. ft. <br />(26.25%) <br />In 1979, the approved plan on file indicates that structural coverage was 24.24%. The approved deck <br />on the south side of the residence was at grade and does not count towards structural coverage. The <br />deck was at some point increased from 4' to 6' and currently has a roof over it. Roofed roofs count <br />towards structural coverage, so the size of the covered roof which was not included in the 1979 plan <br />is a 6' X 26.5' area that totals 159 sq. ft. of additional structural coverage. <br />Hardcover <br />Note: The applicants started out rebuilding what was damaged by the storms, a new survey was <br />not required to rebuild their home. The survey used for these calculations was a 1986 survey. <br />Staff recalculated what was submitted by the applicant. The calculations are not certified by a <br />surveyor. <br />Distance from <br />Shoreline <br />Total Area <br />in Setback <br />Existing <br />Hardcover <br />Allowed <br />Hardcover <br />Proposed <br />Hardcover <br />Variance <br />Requested <br />0’-75’1,080 sq. ft.60 sq. ft.NONE 60 sq. ft. for <br />a lockbox <br />.05% <br />75’-250’6,860 sq. ft.2,515.34 sq. <br />ft. ♦ <br />1,715 sq. ft. <br />(25%) <br />2,568.34 sq. <br />ft. (37.43 %) <br />853.34 sq. ft. <br />(12.43%) <br />The roof that was added requires a hardcover variance for an additional 53 sq. ft. of hardcover which <br />staff calculated as the 2' extension of the 4’ deck by the length of the deck which was shown as <br />uncovered in the 1979 plan. This adds a total of 53 sq. ft. of hardcover. After-the-fact variances for <br />hardcover are required to keep the covered roof. If the variance was denied, the roof and 2' of the <br />deck under it would need to be removed. <br />♦There is another issue with hardcover on this property that is not addressed in the worksheets. The <br />applicant’s drawing of the property shows 3/4" stone along Baldur Park Road and in the yard <br />fi2-f27 Kenton Carlson <br />3-t98 North Shore Drive <br />PC-1 0/19/98 <br />page-3