My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
581
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 12,1998 <br />(#7) TONICWVA SHORES PRIVATE ROAD - CONTINUED <br />Gaffron stated that if the Council would agree conceptually it would give the property owners some <br />direction as io how to proceed. <br />Kellev felt the road should be 24’ wide with a cul-de-sac at the end. <br />Regan questioned if it turns out that the 16’ easement is a private easement if Render will still qualify <br />for the subdivision. <br />Ma\ or Jabbour replied that Render would probably need to move the road off the private easement and <br />start all over with the subdivision process. <br />Regan stated that is not what he personally wants to see happen, and that he wants to see the new houses <br />built. <br />Mayor Jabbour was opposed to making the developer put in a 24’ wide road when the Council has <br />allowed, in the past, a 22' public street. <br />Kellev commented that the Council has forced the 24’ wide roadway issue for many cul-de-sacs in the <br />last 10 years. <br />Mayor Jabbour stated he felt the rule should be abolished. He reminded the Council that during the <br />previous mayor’s term, that he voted to remove that rule. <br />Flint felt the w idth of the road should be at 20’ and the location is good. <br />Kelley questioned if Council allows a road less than 24', then what would the hardship for variances be <br />in the City Ordinances. <br />Ma>or Jabbour replied, the Orono Comprehensive Plan on which the City Code is based was written <br />with the understanding that it is the Councils responsibility to preserve the open spaces, preserve Lake <br />Minnetonka, allow minimum hardcover, and 1 think it is in harmony with the community’s philosophy. <br />Kelley asked if 3420 North Shore Drive currently uses the roadway and if they would want to use this <br />roadwav. <br />Gaffron stated that property has an old driveway which is overgrown at this time but that there is a good <br />chance thev would want to use the roadway. <br />Page? <br />L
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.