My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
10-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:45:55 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
581
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Co^ <br />CITYof ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO.________________ <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />FINDINGS <br />This application was reviewed as Zoning File #2418. <br />The property is located in the LR-IB, One Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning <br />District. <br />The Plaiming Commission reviewed this application on September 21, 1998, and <br />recommended approval on a vote of 6 to 0. <br />4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br />A. The lot meets size and yard setback requirements. <br />B. The zoning lot is located on a peninsula and is irregular in shape. <br />C. Variances were previously granted for hardcover and average lakeshore <br />setback. <br />The Cit>' Council denied the applicant's requesi on September 28, 1998, but due <br />to not receiving complete information to base a decision upon, the applcation <br />was opened for reconsideration on October 12, 1998. <br />Property owners acknowledge that the proposed plan does not include outdoor <br />patios or decks. It is the intent of the City Council that future requests for <br />additional hardcover would not be looked upon favorably. <br />The City Council finds that the conditions c.xisting on this property are peculiar <br />to it and do not apply generally to other property' in this zoning district; that <br />granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor <br />pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely <br />serve as a convenience to the applicants, but is necessary to alleviate a <br />demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br />property- right of the applicants; and would be in keeping with the spirit and <br />intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br />Page 2 of 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.