Laserfiche WebLink
#2398 Wayzata Country Club <br />August 19, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />Review of Potential Impacts <br />A hole-by-hole review of the proposed land alterations is included in the 8/13/98 staff memo. <br />A majority of the proposed plan has little or no impact on neighboring properties and should have <br />no negative environmental effects. Grading plans for most of the tee and bunker reconstruction have <br />been provided. Additionally, a plan for the drain tile system for the bunkers has been submitted, and <br />since the bunkers will primarily be discharging rain water that falls directly in them, there should <br />be no detrimental environmental impact from their eventual discharge to receiving waterways. <br />Certain of the proposed tee locations will be near road or Luce Line rights-of-way or residential lot <br />lines. The zoning code does not specify a minimum setback for golf course tees, the only clear <br />direction in the code is that grading within 5' of a lot boundary would be considered as unusual <br />grading and require special conditional use permit approval. It would appear that all of the proposed <br />grading can (and should) be accomplished without encroaching within the 5' protected zone at lot <br />boundaries, including the Luce Line boundaries. It will be critical, however, in a few areas as noted <br />above, to verify lot lines and tee locations at the time an an'*ual project permit is issued, to avoid <br />encroachment into neighboring properties. <br />Planning Commission consider whether it would be 'appropriate to establish a minimum setback for <br />tees from property boundaries, based on the activity impact on adjacent properties. For instmee, <br />where a tee has historically been, say, 50' from a residential lot line, and a new proposed tee will be <br />very near the lot line, that will change the degree and nature of activity near the residential property. <br />Planning Commission received no comments from the public and concluded that the tee locations <br />were likely notan issue. <br />Tee reconstructions are expected to each involve placement of fill materials in an amount possibly <br />ranging from 50-500 yards each. The applicants' consultant has estimated the total earth movement <br />involved, including the ponds, at 27,500 cubic yards, mostly moving material from place to place <br />on the site and not necessarily needing to import or export materials. Approximately 2,000 cubic <br />yards of sand will be imported for the bunkers. <br />Pond Expansions Will Require Additional Information <br />The proposed pond expansions appear to staff to be conceptually not only appropriate but beneficial <br />in terms of the City's comprehensive storm water management planning. They will create additional <br />storage volume in areas that receive direct golf course runoff, therefore having a potential to provide <br />some retention of nutrients from the runoff. However, virtually no pond design detail has been <br />submitted, and a significantly higher level of engineering detail would be required before a CUP and