08-24-1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

f #2404 Otten Brothers Nursery August 20,1998 Page 2 Pertinent Code Requirements Review Process ZoninR Code Section 10.53, Subds. 5 & 7 indicate that any change to the approved final PUD development plan that increases the 'cube' of a building by more amendment of the final development plan, pursuant to a ^ document that amends the conditions of the PUD Agreement and is signed l^y both the City and the property owner. The City Attorney will address how this should be formatted. Review of Proposed Greenhouse snd Site Plfln Please see the memo of August 14 for a detailed review of the proposed greenhouse and a general update review of the site plan. Retaining Wall / Loading Dock The wall system recently constmeted within Outlet C is intended to function as m o^n loading dock area The wall construction is of manufactured landscaping blocks and therefore likely «ould not need engineering design even though sections are 5-6 feet in height. However, this work d«s require a land alteration permit, and certainly requires site plan approval since it is located w i a ?oad outlot. Outlet C is owned by the Otten ’s, and the City has an underlying R™"* ^ Easement subject to a restriction which limits the City's ability to develop a toad until a number of conditions are met (see Exhibit 1). The applicant has noted that of re-usable materials and could be easily disassembled at such future time that the Outlot is developed for road purposes. The PUD Agreement is mute as to uses of Outlot C, hence this retaining wall / loading dock must be considered as an amendment to the Agreement, as is the greenhouse constraction. Staffs concerned about the impact of activity here as it relates to ."'ighl»n"g residem.a^^^^^^^ which would otherwise enjoy Outlot C as somewhat of a separation buffer. It also wll as an additional eneroachment of our access to the well house. An alternative to this locauon would . . b». "y».1