08-24-1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A variance from allowed hardcover is required as the applicant would remove the foundation and subsequently replace it for the new building. The total amount of hardcover would not charige in the 75'-250' zone. The applicant is only replacing what currently exists, or building over existing hardcover. The lot contains only a small portion of land in the 75'-250 ’ setback from the lake. That portion of the lot is the highest area suitable to building on the site, resulting in a relatively high percentage of hardcover. The total hardcover for the entire lot is only 14.1%. ANALYSIS Variance STATEMENT OF HARDSHIP Applicant's hardship is included as Exhibit B. The applicant should also be asked for their testimony regarding this issue. rriteria for Determining Undue Hardship j The property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under conditions allowed by the official controls. The property can continue to be used as it is currently with the exception of the garage damage. The applicant has stated in his statement of hardship that his insurance ■‘mpany will not pay to repair the existing garage only to replace it. If the applicant i? v <o the zoning requirements the garage would be built in an area on the property that is vei^ to flooding. The applicant would also remove a storage shed that often floods after heavy rain and in the spring. Therefore he has requested a larger garage structure to accommodate additional storage. 2.The plight of the landoNMier is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The property' contains a large drainage ditch the often floods. The best area to build on the lot is the high area where the lot does not flood. U2402 Glen Sauer 4104 Highwood Road Variances 8^17/93 Page 3