Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />!■ <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR AUGUST 10,1998 <br />(U7) 1998 MARINA LICENSES - continued <br />Mayor Jabbour stated that a permit would be required for a fence and a survey would be required <br />with the application. <br />Gaffron suggested that the lot line be staked by the surveyor for either Waade or Dunn, with the <br />other party agreeing to the location. If there is disagreement, the surveyors will need to determine <br />the correct lot line. <br />Durm noted that the existing stakes w-ere placed by his surveyor. <br />Mayor Jabbour suggested that Council approve the marina license for Lakeside Marina with some <br />of the conditions discussed. He indicated that parking and trespassing issues may be ongoing <br />problems, and should be addressed with staff and the police. <br />Waade asked for a deadline date for completion of the fence. <br />Kelley commented that the fence should be constructed within the City standards. He did not favor <br />an 8' fence and would like to see it as low as possible. <br />Mayor Jabbour suggested that Waade and Dunn continue to work on a berm even though other <br />conditions may be agreed upon. <br />Gaffron asked for clarity from Council on the height of the fence and how close to the lake and road <br />it should be constructed. If a fence is not allowed in the 0-75' zone, this may not solve the trespass <br />issue. He noted that Council approved a fence for the DNR and felt it may be acceptable for <br />commercial property to have a fence to the lake to protect both properties. Jabbour agreed. Kelley <br />was opposed to a fence in the 0-75' zone. <br />Goetten asked about plantings to the lake rather than a fence. Gaffron responded that there were two <br />issues. One is screening because of the visual view from a residential to commercial property. The <br />other issue is trespassing. An 8' high screen fence solves both issues. A 6' high fence that doesn't <br />go all the way to each end would help the screening but doesn't solve the trespassing issue. Goetten <br />indicated she would support whatever was best for both property owners. <br />Gaffron suggested a 6' fence between the 75' lake setback and the 30' street setback line, and from <br />there a height that would prohibit people from walking between the properties. The lower height <br />would not provide screening or visible encroachment.