My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-24-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
08-24-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:29:26 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:24:16 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
490
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Zoning File #2398 <br />August 13, 1998 <br />Page 7 <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />All grading work shall be subject to conformance with the "Best Management <br />Practices for Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas", and although it is not likely <br />to be a necessary condition in a golf course context, approval should be conditioned <br />on proper erosion controls and immediate revegetation of all disturbed area.*;. <br />Way^ta Country Club should check with the City of Wayzata to see if they any <br />permit requirements for the portions of work that actually occur within City of <br />Wayzata boundaries. <br />The ponds to be expanded on holes #5, 6, and 12 will require separate Conditional <br />Use Permit applications including a more detailed review process and approval from <br />other Jurisdictional agencies prior to construction. Note that specifically in the case <br />of the pond on hole #6, the expansion of the pond requires a variance since it is a <br />City-protected wetland. <br />Issues for Discussion <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Does Planning Commission have any concerns specifically about the proposed tee <br />and bunker plan? <br />Does Planning Commission feel that a specific setback standard should be <br />established for tees near residential or right-of-way property boundaries? Is there any <br />public comment regardmo the impacts of the proposed changes to the course? <br />Does the applicant have a more defined limetable fcr completion of specific portions <br />of the improvement plan? What elements are proposed for 1998-99? <br />Does Planning Commission agree with the staff recommendation for a concept <br />approval and conditional use permit approval for the tee and bunker plan at this time <br />with an annual permit program as outlined above? <br />5. Does Planning Commission have any additional concerns about the proposal? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of a conditional use permit for the tee and bunker program as * ibmitted <br />with the conditions outlined above. Staff recommends conceptual approval of the 3 pond <br />expansions, subject to completing a separate conditional use permit approval process for each prior <br />to construction. Concept approval at this time should not be construed as binding; the merits of each <br />pond expansion project must be taken into account once the required detail plans are submitted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.