Laserfiche WebLink
John C. DeMoss <br />May 3, 1998 <br />Page 2 <br />M <'To-,T “ 1>« time. In a letter on file from Mr Moe <br />dated November 15,1971 he indicates he granted the City a sewer easement over 'Parcel 260' i e <br />a portion of theproperty of Portiand Place. City files appear to contain no easement doc^eoB <br />to would confirm or deny whether an easement was granted for the sewer in Portland PlL- at to <br />date I must assume there is no easement of reeord. and ask to such an easement be grmted ?o to <br />City, per th^ conditions of Resolution No. 3950. ^ <br />wLlr Po^,!d"m?ril ^ of discrepancy regarding <br />a ^ ’“0 «»™”«'n>ent review by to Planning <br />at to, ™ ^ by their surveyor. Sw <br />In regards to Item 4(d), satisfaction of conditions of Resolution #3950: <br />Resolution No. 3950 (vacation approval. Doc. #6792311) contains to following conditions- <br />3. Granting of drainage easement over drainage ways (Doc. #6792314). <br />Granting of easement for sanitary sewer 1 ines within parcels A, G, B, D and/or F <br />(easement signed but not filed pending City creation of legal description). <br />ranting of easements for any other subsequently identified existing utilities <br />(pending). <br />In regards to Item 4(e), satisfaction of conditions of Resolution #3963: <br />Resolution No. 3963 (variance approval. Doc. # 6792312) contains the following conditions: <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />No action required <br />No action required <br />V