My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
08-10-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:08:01 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:05:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 11,1998 <br />(#21) WORK PLAN FOR COMPREHENSIVE PL AN UPDA TE - continued <br />Kelley questioned if staff would have time to work on a market analysis. Moorse responded that <br />a consultant could be used. <br />Jabbour felt a needs study would be more important than a market analysis. <br />Kelley noted that the fiill impact of new Highway 12 is not known at this time and could affect <br />development. <br />Moorse expressed concern that the Comprehensive Plan could be changed limiting property <br />owners to certain types of uses, which may never actually take place. This could create a <br />hardship for the property owners and delay development. <br />Moorse suggested discussion continue after meeting with Long Lake representatives. <br />(#22) SELECTION OF DATE(S) FOR JOINT WORK SESSION WITH LONG LAKE <br />CITY COUNCIL <br />It was determined that August 18 or 19 would be optional dates to meet with the Long Lake City <br />Council. <br />A budget work session was scheduled for August 10, 1998 and 7:30 a,m. <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />Attorney Barrett addressed the policy of taking conservation easements as part of the subdivision <br />process. He explained that the conservation easement states that no structure shall be constructed <br />within the easement, including docks and hardcover of any nature. Mr. White s attorney has <br />requested that the conser\'ation easement be amended to allow for a dock. Barrett asked Council <br />if they would use the conservation easement as a reason not to grant a dock license, or if there <br />could be circumstances that would allow a dock. <br />Gaffron commented that there was not a long history of the City taking action to allow docks in a <br />wetland. He referenced applications on North Femdale Road and Fox Street that were denied. <br />Gaffron explained that in Mr. White’s case, in order to get to the open water of the lake he would <br />have to cross the wetland. Gaffron thought he had the right to get to the lake but he would need <br />variances to do so. <br />20
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.