My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-10-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
08-10-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 3:08:01 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 3:05:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
279
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 10,1997 <br />(#4 - #2283 Gary and Bonnie Bimbaum - Continued) <br />Bimbaum reiterated that conditions have not changed since 1987 and findings are <br />appropriate. <br />Jabbour said he would support the application as the applicant had been informed the lot <br />was buildable and sewer was assessed. He agreed that Ae property should have been <br />viewed differently when sewer was installed. <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3997-A. <br />Kelley asked for discussion regarding the fence. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant if he would eliminate the fence. <br />Bimbaum said the fence is on City property and was there when he purchased his <br />property. He noted the fence runs along the access road to the beach and would be a <br />safety concern with snowmobilers if the fence was eliminated. <br />Jabbour said he would support the fence as it is located on City property. He informed <br />Bimbaum that typically no fencing is allowed in the 0-75' lakeshore setback. <br />Vote: Ayes 3, Nays 2, Goetten, Flint. <br />(#5) #2310 DICK BURY, CLASSIC CAR SALES, 3850 SHORELINE DRIVE - <br />REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION/FINDINGS OF SUBSTANTIALLY <br />SINHLAR USE <br />The applicant was present. <br />Kelley asked for definition of a classic car. Mr. Bury said the list is distinct and does not <br />cheinge and includes cars built between 1925 and 1948. <br />• • <br />Van Zomeren distributed photographs. She reported that the applicant is requesting <br />clarification of the intent and purpose of the B5 zoning district to find classic car sales as <br />a substantially similar use to others in the zoning distiict, specificeilly, an antique store or <br />a museum. The B-5 Zoning District is a limited neighborhood business district. Van <br />Zomeren said in reviewing the list of permitted and conditional uses. Staff felt the use <br />would be similar to that of an antique store. The Plaiming Commission, however, voted <br />6-0 in denial of the application as they did not find it consistent and were concerned with <br />outside display and storage. Van Zomeren asked Council to direct Staff to draft a <br />resolution to approve or deny the request.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.