Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />I*. <br />I • <br />TO; <br />FROH: <br />DATE: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Plannlne Cotssalaaion and Council,; <br />Jaanno A. Jtebusth, Aaat. Zonins Adotaiatwtpi <br />Decaxobar 21, 1978 • . • . '■ <br />i^8 Jameo K. Undoay, 2505, Kelly, <br />mm <br />SKETCH FLAK REVIEW <br />Mr. Lindsay proposes dividing Lot I of tho Kelly Avenue :^dlvto« <br />into three one-acre lots. Please review appUcaticn fot'^dw^ <br />reason for platting. Lots laeet the required «*«;;?>? ‘^52^ <br />(LR-13). Each lot appears to havo the mininMn 140* Ukoihorn .wtdAJ^; <br />but lot dimensions are not complete and will be. reviewed hef«f%'‘‘“^'^=* <br />presentation. The setbacks for exieting buildingi on I«te .liar** <br />are satisfactory but the duplex on U>t 3 will require^ d-vevii^* ^ <br />rear yard setback. •'. <br />Access road - The existing driveway will appear as <br />easement serving Lots 1 and 2. <br />Wetland - The wetland at tiie northwest comer of parcel has not’bean' <br />designated on plan. We will require a conservation end; * <br />xlowage easement over the wetland. <br />.- : <br />Riparian rights - The applicant requests a Joint dock for each lot ‘ <br />(one dock serving two dwelling units). If Planning <br />Coomission approves, then a variance to the Flood <br />Plain - Wetlands Management Ordinance must be given <br />(similar to one Issued for Che Farm at -l^ng Lake <br />and Victoria Gr^Ston). Lot 1 is involved; Lot 2 <br />appears to have 15'-20' of available lakeahore but <br />tho setback request of 10' will take most of It, <br />and Lot 3 would not be involved. <br />9 • • <br />Staff recommends a private outlot over the existing <br />dock aroa. This alternative will lessen the impact <br />on wetland and dismiss the need for a variance. <br />Hear yard setback vartonco - Ordinai»ce 3A.A50 <br />Required: <br />Proposed: <br />Variance: <br />30' <br />6' <br />24' - 801