My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:46:57 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:39:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />fv > <br />a. <br />b. <br />c. <br />d. <br />e. <br />f. <br />g- <br />The relationship between applicant's property and the orientation of <br />Truffula Trail is unique to applicant's property, because headlights from <br />traffic exiting Truffula Trail aim directly at applicant's residence, and his <br />rear yard is relatively open and not vegetated at this time. <br />The City has maintained a character of open spaces, not hemmed in by <br />privacy fences, along collector roads. Very few 6-foot fences along road <br />frontages can be found within the rural area. A 6' fence at the intended <br />location alters the essential character of the locality, is not in keeping <br />with the normal practice within Orono's rural area, and is not appropriate <br />on a permanent basis. <br />The peculiarities of this property which contrast it with other properties, <br />is that it lines up directly across from a road access where the elevations <br />of the property and said road access result in headlights shining directly <br />at the applicant's residence. <br />Only a limited number of properties in the RR-IB Zoning District are <br />similarly situated so as to be affected by headlights from traffic exiting <br />a nearby road. <br />The applicant has demonstrated specific scr»*ening needs which would <br />preserve his enjoyment of his propert>', and Planning Commission agrees <br />that such screening needs are legitimate but cannot be immediately met <br />by a vegetative screen which will take a period of time to establish. <br />While the variance wilt serve as a convenience to the applicant, applicant <br />has demonstrated hardships and difficulties which suggest that until a <br />vegetative barrier is established, headlights will continue to be a problem. <br />The granting of a limited-term variance allowing tw'o growing seasons for <br />establishment of a suitable vegetative barrier, will accomplish the property <br />owner's screening goals while having only a short-term visual impact on <br />Page 2 of 6 <br />M
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.