Laserfiche WebLink
CQUNOiL f.r:_ <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION JAN 2 6 1998 <br />CITY cr ORor-jo <br />Date: January 22, 1998 <br />Item No <br />Department Approval: Administrator Approval:Agenda Section: <br />Name: Michael P. Gaffron Zoning <br />Title: Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Item Description: #2319 Lauer Homes, Inc., 1040 Tonkawa Road-Variance-Resolution <br />Zoning District: <br />Application: <br />LR-IB, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, Sewered, 1-acre <br />Request for 75-250' hardcover variance for construction of a new residence <br />to replace the existing residence. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Resolution <br />B - Memo & Exhibits of January 14,1998 <br />C - Applicant’s Revised Plan at 30% Hardcover <br />Summary <br />Please review the memo and exhibits of January 14. Briefly, applicant requests a hardcover variance <br />in the 75-250' zone for construction of a new residence on this 1.85 acre lot. Pre-existing 75-250 ’ <br />hardcover is 39.4%, including a pool which has recently been removed Initially proposed hardcover <br />was 34.5% where only 25% is normally allowed. At the Planning Commission meeting, members <br />suggested that for new construction it is difficult to justify granting of any hardcover variance. <br />Applicant then distributed a revised concept plan showing how the site plan could be revised to <br />reduce hardcover to 30%. <br />Planning Commission Recommendation <br />At their January 20 meeting. Planning Commission voted 3-2 to recommend approval subject to 75- <br />250' hardcover not exceeding 30%. The majority vote apparently was based on acceptance of the <br />applicant s position that moving the house further from the lake (so greater portions are in the 250- <br />500' zone) would be difficult due to topography and potential loss of trees; reduction from 39.4% <br />to 30 “/o was apparently also a plus in the eyes of the majority, given that if no variance is granted, <br />the c,xisting house might only be remodeled and no hardcover reduction would occur. <br />The neighboring property owner to the north suggested that it would potentially have a negative <br />J