My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:46:57 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:39:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCILMEETING HELD ON <br />DECEMBER 8,1997 ^ <br />Flint asked how the traffic flow worked. The road and paved walkways were not9^^ <br />Gleason said if the units were staggered, a service door could be provided. He said h^JjV <br />normally builds courtyards into the project. Gleason said two separated walkways are <br />being provided where one would normally be shown. This is being done in order to save <br />trees. <br />Kelley was informed that there would be a homeowners association. He asked about <br />outdoor storage. Gleason said no outdoor storage would be allowed. No boats could be <br />placed in the driveway and cars would be allowed in the driveways only temporarily. <br />Van Zomeren referenced the restrictive covenant document noted under #7 on page 6 of <br />the resolution. Kelley questioned whether the Council should review that document. <br />Gleason said the homeowners association document would be submitted with the final <br />plat. Kelley said he would not want to wait until that point and have the Council deny it. <br />Jabbour said it would be more appropriate to give direction now on what is expected. <br />Jabbour informed Goetten that the Council can make conditions on a homeowners <br />association. Gleason said he would submit the document to staff. It was questioned <br />how that would assist enforcement since the document can be modified. Jabbour said <br />modifications would have to be part of the resolution. Gleason said a modification <br />would also require 100% approval, one denial would totally deny it, and would require
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.