Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON OCTOBER 20, 1997 <br />(#2 - #2308 Brook Park Realty - Continued) <br />Hawn asked about moving the water main. Kellogg said the proper alignment would be <br />to extend the ma ,i to the west and south down to CoRd 15 in order to improve the flows. <br />Based on the sketch plan review for future expansion plans, it would make sense, <br />according to Kellogg. Hawn asked if this was possible to do. Kellogg said it could be <br />extended with the future proposal. The water main is stubbed out. Hawn informed <br />Kellogg that the developer does not currently own the property. Kellogg said he had been <br />under the impression that they did but noted the improvement could occur when that <br />purchase is made. Van Zomeren concurred that the water main could be extended in the <br />future. Hawn said that request could be required when that property is purchased but <br />would not affect this current plan. <br />Van Zomeren asked the Commission to consider the pavement width and the number of <br />units on the cul-de-sac, noting 12 units would be served by the driveway without a cul- <br />de-sac. The cul-de-sac does not meet all of the standards. <br />Van Zomeren read through the letter of comments from the landscape architect. The <br />architect noted the well formed trees and the desirability to preserve them. He suggested <br />a tree survey be conducted for assessment and evaluation to include a layout. Case <br />suggested adjustments be made to the 28' road width, a reduction in the front yard <br />setback, shift of the pond, grading, and fencing during construction. Van Zomeren <br />reviewed items 1-3 of the landscaping plan noting the trail, removal of trash, and the need <br />for a restrictive covenant that is compatible with the staff report. Van Zomeren said she <br />concurred with the contents in the letter recognizing the conflict with the road width and <br />pavement versus the preservation of trees. <br />Bill Gleason said he just received the report and has not had the time to review the <br />contents. He noted a certain amount of trees vvill be lost with the construction. He has <br />experienced an approximate 50% salvage and utilizes a replacement program. Gleason <br />does not believe a 1:1 replacement ratio is realistic. <br />Gleason said the plan calls for the road to run into the development and ends there until <br />such time it can be expanded into the future proposed development to the west. Gleason <br />said he showed that development to allow the City to view possibilities for the future. <br />The land has not been purchased as of this date. The cul-de-sac will be constructed, <br />meanwhile, with no other means of egress. County Road 15 cannot be reached until such <br />time the road is expanded. <br />A drivew'ay will be utilized to service units. While it does not meet the standard <br />requirements, it is not meant to go anywhere else but to these units. Gleason said he is <br />willing to reduce the size of the road to preserve trees. As to a shift of the water retention <br />pond, Gleason said he does not see any viable alternate location.