My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:46:57 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:39:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JULY 21,1997 <br />(#23- #2263 Brook Park Realty - Continued) <br />McMillan asked about guest parking. Bill Gleason said each unit would have room for two cars <br />in the garage and two cars in front of the units. There will be room elsewhere for parking and a <br />public road going through the development. Green spaces will be provided. <br />Hawn asked if it was impossible to rezone the area. Hawn indicated that the property is the last <br />area available for affordable housing. The proposal is way over the density that can be allowed <br />but Hawi. said she favors the effort. Bill Gleason reiterated that they misunderstood the zomng. <br />Gaffron said any higher density would require rezoning. He informed the Commissioners that m <br />order to allow more than three units per acre, a new zone would have to be created. Hawn aske <br />if there were any other area where low cost housing could be built. Gaffron said he did not think <br />so, this is the only area zoned for multiple family in Navarre. <br />Hawn said she would like to pursue rezoning of this property. Berg said she would consider <br />reviewing it but not for the number of units as proposed. McMillan agreed vnih Berg. Berg said <br />she understood the ncem but felt the number proposed was too dense. Smith agreed with <br />Berg. <br />McMillan noted that any density between 29 and 45 units would still require rezoning. 9^^ <br />said this would require changing the LR-lC-1 zone standards or creating a new zone which takes <br />time. Smith also indicated that the unit price would not necessarily come down much in cost. <br />Smith said she overall supports the proposal but does not favor rezoning to the extent needed for <br />the density requested. She said the other issues are probably solvable. <br />Berg said she liked the look of the proposal. <br />John Gleason said they would try to maintain the price. He ^ked what the time frame was or <br />rezoning. Gaffron said the Council would likely want to review all of Navarre on a <br />comprehensive level and estimated a minimum of six months. <br />John Gleason asked if the Commission thought the proposal with less density was favorable. <br />Berg concurred noting the desire for affordable housing while still meeting the benchmark <br />density. <br />Gleason asked how they could come up with a density level. Smith informed him that any <br />density level over 28 or 29 units would require rezoning. G^on reiterated that aensity over Z <br />units would require at least six months for review of the zoning.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.