My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
01-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:46:57 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:39:03 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JANUARY 12,1998 <br />(#1 Femdale Road North Road Improvement - Continued) <br />Nancy Berg asked about funding for a road less than 28' in width. Jabbour said a narrower road <br />would have to be assessed. He also reported that the two cities have to agree on the road design. <br />Oappa noted that the new annual budget allows only $100,000 ° <br />Jabbour indicated there is the option of repaving only at a cost of $200,000-$300,000. <br />A gentleman in the audience asked how long the road construction would take. Kellogg said the <br />construction would take about two months depending on weather conditions. <br />Donna Hanson asked if there was a reason why the staking stopped on the east side of the L ice <br />Line She indicated the toad is not staked in front of her home. Kellogg noted that between Hwy <br />12 and the Luce Line, the road is offset to the Orono side with the east edge pulled inward. <br />There are paints marks along the roadway indicating the proposed road location but recent <br />snowfall has covered it. <br />Chloe Aekman was informed that MSA criteria would be used for building the toad at a 28’ <br />width. Flint indicated that repaving the toad does not qualify for MSA funding. <br />Goetten said discussions have been held for many years regarding road r <br />Femdale. She feels it should he reconstrueted and a narrower width considered. She would 1 <br />the road work to be done correctly and last for a longer time penod. Residents informed her of <br />the need for a bike path. She is not in favor of the 36' width. Goetten feels quesuons needs to be <br />addressed with the City of Plymouth. <br />Peterson noted that the speed limit is proposed to be reduced from 40 mph to 30 mph. The <br />citizen survey reflected a 35 mph speed. Kellogg said a 35 mph speedy discussed at th <br />design meeting but due to the design of the road, the speed will be at 30 mph, regardless of th <br />road width. <br />Flint said he agreed with eliminating the 36 ’ wide possibility. He indicated, between “28' and <br />S' width, a concern for increased traffic with a 32' wide road However he is concerned iHhe <br />road is built at 28', the road may be inadequate. Kellogg indicated, based on co^ents rew«^^ <br />with bikers using the toad, the 32' width would accomplish the needs ■ ■ <br />asked why the road would be used for bikers and joggers if the trail was built. Kellogg said <br />based off of the comments received. <br />Goetten said she assumed a 28' wide road would eliminate the path. Gappa «id there wo^d be <br />two P’ wide lanes with 4* on the outside of the road for bikers due to the P^k Commission <br />members indicating that high speed bikers would not use the trail. The would o^ be <br />placed on one side of the road. Flint indicated that bike trails are generally 8 wide The <br />proposal would include a 4’ lane on the road for fast bicyclists and an 8 off-road trail. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.