My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1998
>
06-22-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:42:29 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:33:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 8,1998 <br />! <br />1 <br />! 1 <br />B. RESCHEDULE ASSESSMENT HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 4090 <br />Peterson moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4090, rescheduling the public hearing <br />on the proposed assessment for the Shoreline/Heritage sanitary sewer project to June 29, 1998 at <br />7:00 p.m. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Kelley questioned why the hearing was scheduled for June 29,1998 at a special meeting instead of <br />at the regular June 22 meeting. Jabbour responded that the June 22 meeting would not meet the <br />publication requirements. Gappa added that the City would like to award the contract before July <br />so wv aid like to reschedule the hearing earlier than the regular meeting of July 13. Jabbour <br />suggested a joint work session with Planning Commission prior to the public hearing. <br />(#2) SAGA HILL PARK ACCESS INFORMATION MEETING <br />Jabbour explained the purpose of the meeting was to discuss acquiring access to the park. He gave <br />a brief history of the project. The neighbors requested that the City acquire a tax forfeit parcel in the <br />area for a park. At the same time, there were several parcels of land for sale that the neighbors felt <br />they could acquire by fund raising and potential grants from the DNR. Several months later. Mayor <br />Jabbour and Park Commissioner McMillan met with the neighbois to e.xplain the status of the <br />project. As a result of the meeting, the City actively pursued the purchase of the tax forfeit property <br />and acquired it from Hennepin County. At the time the City Council decided to move ahead to <br />acquire the tax forfeit parcel, the Council made it clear that the property could be used in a more <br />active way than a natural area. The neighbors then successfiilly raised two-thirds of the cost of the <br />other parcels, and these were acquired also. There were deed restrictions on the parcels acquired <br />with the DNR grant, which three of the Council Members were concerned about. <br />The neighbors recently asked the City to endorse a second grant request from the DNR. A condition <br />of that grant request was that access to the park be resolved. Mayor Jabbour and Council Member <br />Flint have met with members of the Church to discuss access issues. The City felt a good option for <br />park access was through the Church property. However, the Church does not want to be put in a <br />position which would conflict with any of the neighbors. <br />Moorse presented several alternatives for accessing the park. <br />1. Construct a road that uses the Garden Lane right-of-way, with a parking lot on the <br />park property. Advantages are that a public right-of-way would be used and the <br />parking lot would be placed on existing public land. Disadvantages include <br />construction of an expensive roadway that would change the character of the area; <br />it could encourage development that may not happen without the City building the <br />roadway. Also, existing park land would be used for a parking lot. The estimated <br />cost of the roadway is $ 100,000.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.