My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
06-22-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:42:29 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:33:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 8,1998 <br />(#12) #2372 BARRY HAGLUND, 4590 NORTH ARM DRIVE WEST - continued <br />Kellev suEBested possible stormwater management fees similar to park dedieation fees^ He ^so felt <br />the cL should actively work on obtaining North Arm Lane as a City road. If the road needs to <br />u^g^lf o"^ -he Armstrongs, property owners on both sides of the road could be <br />assessed. <br />hhhntir did not want to make the applicant wait for the City to complete the road acquisition arid <br />upgrade process. Kelley did not object to the applicant obtaining the necessary easemen s o <br />cLpIete his subdivision while the City pursues the road issues. <br />Goetten asked if North Arm Lane was a public or private road. Gaffron explained that the City has <br />a prescriptive easement over approximately 15' of the gravel road. <br />Janiece Haglund asked for clarification of the triangular piece the City is requesting at North <br />l^e »d N o T/^ Drive. Gaffron explained that it is needed for righwf^way to a » ^ <br />intersection. Approximately 50' of right-of-way is being requested. Dedication for rig y <br />along North Arm Drive is also being requested. <br />Janiece Haglund expressed concern about screening auhe comer <br />if the City makes road improvements at the comer. Gappa responded that the City P <br />as much as possible providing the sight lines are maintained. <br />as or better than what currently leaves the site to get a vanance from the Watershed <br />pu ’t a pond on the site. Kellogg recommended that a pond be installed because the site lends its <br />to a pond, as opposed to the previous application where the lot was sma er. <br />Flint asked about the status of North Arm Lane being either rural or urban. Gaffron to^ponded Aat <br />t ^ m tVip T R 1A district which is a 2 acre lakcshore zone but not provi <br />InSTuti ties m road be urban if considering the lakeshore district, but rural rn <br />”r b“of t!« 2rere ^ size. Flint asked if the City would extend North Arm Lane rn he <br />future. Gaffron responded that North Arm Lane turns into a driveway serving the prope y <br />north. There is a potential that the Armstrongs could sell or develop their property into acre <br />which could be accessed off of North Arm Lane.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.