Laserfiche WebLink
i/--^OFp«i <br />lORONOIk.:;.,-v^5m^jiil <br />Telephone 473*7357 <br />j:-7 <br />CITY of ORONO <br />'•osl Office Box 6G» Crystal Bay. Minnesota 55323* Municipal Offices <br />0/1 the North Shore of Lake Minnetonka <br />May 16, 1983 <br />i <br />' <br />Mr. Roy E. Ahern <br />6449 Barrie Road <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 <br />V <br />Re: Big Island <br />Dear Mr. Ahern: <br />Enclosed are separate information packets on your two Big Island <br />last December^ status under the revised zoning ordinance adopted <br />consider completing and returning the variance <br />esolution forms (#2) and the lot combination forms (#3) for both <br />■Fi 1 properties. Doing this will ensure that you receive the <br />biH benefits of the ordinance designed to protect <br />^^^ those properties with existing cabins. <br />RECORD LOT #15 -3 <br />Rfco?d*Lot^ll5^''Jb^ problem with the record lot '^asignation for <br />hn? should not return the variance resolution, <br />factn^? u and whatever otherfactual data you believe will support your challenge. <br />Frommes, concerning these <br />and the City s position classifying those six lots as <br />one building site. As I have said to her and previously to you, I <br />believe you have the following options available: <br /><^^ty designation and retain all six lots together as <br />moL ^ rebuild the existing cabin (?) or <br />f , ^ ey^ replace it with a new cabin located either in the <br />.. ^ ° ® this case, I suggest you sign and return <br />variance resolution to guarantee the automatic/no fee variance. <br />^ who ooJJi^n the back lots to another abutting property owner <br />into his property without creating <br />a new building site. in this case, to rebuild the cabin on the <br />you would have to formally apply for a change in the <br />record lot designation and for a lot area variance, and perhaps for <br />variances. Ey-h variances would most likely be approved but the burden would be on you to; . j t't*