06-22-1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r #2361 - Yaeger June 11,1998 Page 5 Issues for Discussion 1. Should Lot 64 be designated as an individual Record Lot separate from Lots 65-8-9-10-11? 2. If so, should the after-the-fact variances be granted to allow the new cabin and gazebo to remain in their non-conforming locations? Options for Consideration TSSl IE 1 - Record Lot Status A.Recommend denial of the lot area and width variance, concluding that Record Lot #15 must consist of all 6 separate tax parcels. [Implicatiom: Lot 64 remains imbuildable, and it follows that the cabin and gazebo constructed without permits must be removed] OR B.Recommend approval of the lot area and width variance, concluding that Record Lot #15 should be separated into two individual record lots (#15 A and # 1 5B). [Implications: Lot 64 gains Record Lot status and the variances for cabin and gazebo construction can be reviewed on their own merits] OR C.Recommend approval of a lot w idth and area variance conditioned on applicant acquiring some specified additional adjacent (or non-adjacent?) land for combination (or special lot combination?) with Lot 64. [Implications: Lot 64 remains imbuildable unless/until additional land is added to it; cabin and gazebo variances remain in limbo for a limited time until applicant can acquire additional land] QR, D. Other, or some combination of the above. ISSIJF. 2 - Cnbin and Gazebo Variances Recommend that the new cabin and gazebo be relocated to meet 75' lakeshore setback and 10' side setbacks, which would eliminate the hardcover variance; and that the cabin be provided with a continuous enclosed approved foundation to frost level. QR, B Recommend that the new cabin and gazebo be allow'ed to remain in place, that lake setback, side setback and 0-75' hardcover variances be granted (specifically define the hardships that support such a position) but require that the cabin be provided with continuous enclosed approved foundation to frost level. QR