My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
06-22-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:42:29 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:33:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
372
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR JUNE 8,1998 <br />(#2) Saga Hill Park Access Information Meeting - continued <br />Kelley stated all options for access should be pursued to see which one is the most feasible and cost- <br />effective for the City. He thought the estimate of $100,000 to develop Garden Lane was low and <br />was not in favor of spending $200,000-300,000 to build a road to access the park. <br />Jabbour favored relocating the easements on the Church property. If the Church were in a non- <br />controversial position, a land swap or shared use of the parking lot would be preferred. <br />Peterson concurred with Jabbour but asked for clarification on the map of the location of the <br />easement to be vacated and the 20' easement which would be used to access the park. <br />Kelley was in favor of vacating the easement along the north and east/west property lines. He was <br />sympathetic to the Valek's situation. Kelley also thought the City should continue to work with the <br />Church. <br />Goetten agreed with the easement vacation. <br />Flint was also opposed to building a road on Garden Lane because it would be too expensive and he <br />did not want to encourage development of the property to the north. Overdevelopment of that <br />property could also cause erosion into the Wildhurst area. In his opinion, relocating the easement <br />is the second best alternative. He would prefer purchasing the Church parking lot for a niunber of <br />reasons. There would be no need for two parking lots. The Church currently uses their property for <br />a ball field when parking is not needed. It would make sense to put a City ballfield in the saipe area. <br />The issue of safety because children are not visible would be addressed with a ballfield in the Church <br />lot. Few trees would need to be cut. If the City could buy the property, the Church could still use <br />the parking lot when it needed to. He felt that it was unfortunate that the Church was in a difficult <br />position with the neighbors. <br />Jabbour noted that the City has considered potentially buying a piece of land to swap with the <br />Church for the parking lot. <br />Goetten agreed with other Council Members and would like to see discussions continue with the <br />Church with the full support of Council. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend that City staff, along with the City Attorney and <br />Mayor, work on negotiations with the Church for the best possible access to the property. Vote: <br />Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.