My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:29:14 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:23:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 <br />(#12 - Navarre Housing Study - Continued) <br />Kelley was informed that the number of affordable homes were 183. It was unknown <br />what percentage is being mandated by the Met Council for affordability. Van Zomeren <br />said the Navarre irea homes meeting the affordability criteria is 6% of the total homes in <br />the City. Van Zomeren said Staff feels there is 24% of the housing that will be found to <br />meet the affordability criteria. The average property value in Navarre is $107,000 with <br />$220,000 overall in the City of Orono. The information will be used for exploring grant <br />possibilities and updating the Comprehensive Plan. Other cities are assisting in <br />reviewing affordable housing in the area. <br />Jabbour said the Planning Commission was asking what grants are available. It was <br />noted that the City has received CDBG funding in the past, though not for 1997. <br />Jabbour commented regarding the Planning Department analyzing variance applications <br />and cataloging them. He feels it is fruitless to amend zoning requirements as applicants <br />will adjust their needs accordingly and will increase the number of variance requests <br />accordingly. Van Zomeren responded that she feels this will result in obtaining a <br />recommendation from the Planning Commission for elimination of some variances. She <br />noted according to the oversize accessory chart, no variances are allowed and could be <br />more restrictive. Van Zomeren said this information has allowed her to have a better <br />understanding of what has been approved in the past. <br />Jabbour noted the concern over drifting from cur main objectives. Peterson said she has <br />been told that the Council was more objective in the past and believes the Planning <br />Commission could be more restrictive. Jabbour urged that Staff checks with Council <br />before fully developing an idea. <br />Goetten said she would like to see the Planning Commission more restrictive in their <br />approvals. She noted that this results in it being more difficult to change an application <br />at the Council level. <br />Van Zomeren said new application forms are being developed which will require more <br />information to be supplied by the applicant. <br />Flint noted that the analysis should not be tied into statistics from the Met Council. He <br />indicated the City is trying to develop a community of different income levels. <br />Jabbour noted that there should be no leeway given from the zoning code regardless of <br />the cost of the residence.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.