My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:29:14 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:23:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 <br />(#10 - #2314 Hoyt Development - Continued) <br />Van Zomeren clarified the original recommendation which would eliminate the duplex <br />credit and just restrict the duplex credit to the B3 Zoning District only. She does not <br />believe the duplex credit is the best method for buffering single family residences from <br />commercial zoning. Kelley disagreed noting the Highway 12 Corridor has commercial <br />property with multi-housing behind it and then single family homes. He reconfirmed the <br />need for such buffering but noted that the subject property was not on Highway 12. Van <br />Zomeren restated that buffering is appropriate but this method is not appropriate. She <br />indicated what is done in the commercial district affects the duplex credit which should <br />not occur. She feels a determination should be made where the duplex credit should be <br />located. <br />Jabbour said he is against spot zoning and indicated a 4/5th majority vote is required. <br />There were no public comments. The public hearing was closed. <br />Jabbour suggested eliminating the loop in the ordinance noting he was against <br />eliminating the outlot. Hoyt noted that he would have preferred to build a single family <br />home but could not do so because of the outlot. He questioned whether the outlot could <br />be rearranged but said he needed the option to build the twinhome. Ho>t said the <br />existing building is only 5' from the right-of-way whic •. reates pioblems. He noted that <br />elimination of the outlot was not part of this propoi <br />Jabbour asked about eliminating the duplex credit. Van Zomeren said the Planning <br />Commission recommended keeping the duplex credit with a B3 add-on. This was not <br />recommended by Staff. She indicated that action would be required on the amendment <br />before a CUP could occur for this proposal. <br />Kelley said he had a problem with the B3 Zoning noting the reasoning behind it was for <br />existing use, Rick's Super Valu. Kelley said the B3 is just like commercial property with <br />d larger building. He is concerned that another concept could end up in that building. <br />He would not like to see the duplex credit tied to the B3. <br />Jabbour asked if the duplex credit extends around the B3 in the rest of the zoning. <br />Kelley asked the reason for applying it only to the B3 district, where the existing use is a <br />grocery store. Van Zomeren said it is not the current use but the zoning classification <br />which is the link that supports the higher density. Kelley indicated the whole area is the <br />shopping area noting a hardware store across the street. He questioned what would <br />occur if Hoyt Development comes in and the only B3 in the City is because it is a <br />grocery' store and attaching this use to one place. He noted that Kelly Avenue is eligible <br />across from where nc lives. Hoyt felt the focus is where the city wants it to occur. He <br />thought the contemplation of a duplex was a good idea.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.