My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:29:14 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:23:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON DECEMBER 8,1997 <br />(#5 - #2264 Janet Kieman - Continued) <br />Jabbour noted that it is not the Council's intent to design the home but were trying to <br />determine the issues of concern. He said the majority of the Council feels the resolution <br />could be amended if the structure was relocated out of the 75' setback or the portion <br />eliminated in the 0-75' setback. Kieman asked if this included the terrace and stairs. <br />Jabbour said the terrace would have to be located out of the 0-75', but the stairs could <br />remain. He noted the house was only allowed to remain where it was located due to the <br />use of the existing foundation. <br />Peterson asked if the 6-8' distance into the 0-75' setback included the terrace. Gaffron <br />said it did not. He said the plan would have to be moved back 20' to allow the terrace to <br />be located out of the 0-75' setback. <br />Kieman noted that she had significantly reduced the hardcover in the 0-75' setback. <br />Jabbour agreed but noted that the requirement is for zero hardcover in the 0-75' setback <br />with none of the original house remaining. <br />Jabbour asked the applicant if she would like to take time to consider her options at this <br />time. He clarified that the resolution could be amended with the house as designed as <br />long as no portion of the house or terrace is located in the 0-75' setback. <br />Kieman noted the problem with getting closer to the garage with the elevations. Gaffron <br />showed the site plan and the difficulty in making use of the existing garage as planned if <br />the stmeture is pushed back on the property, with having to swing into the garage if it is <br />moved to the west. Jabbour suggested it li e stmeture is moved to the north, there would <br />be more space in front of the old garage, ’vieman questioned whether this would affect <br />the drainficld. Gaffron said it would not create a problem as sewer will be ready to serve <br />the property. He said grading may be of question. Kieman asked Council to consider <br />the busyness of CoRd 15 and her desire to keep as far away from that road as possible. <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to continue the agenda item to the end of the Zoning <br />Administrator's Report. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#6) #2279 G. MARC AND TRACY WHITEHEAD, 1220 LYMAN AVENUE - <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT - RESOLUTION NO. 3966 <br />Tracy Whitehead and Attorney, John Winston, were present. <br />Jabbour ascertained from City Attorney Barrett that the applicant and he have reached a <br />conclusion regarding the park dedication fee. Gaffron acknowledged that the <br />preliminaiy' plat was being reconsidered because of the park dedication fee.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.