My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
01-12-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:29:14 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:23:06 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
217
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />V <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 <br />(#7 - #2314 John Bessesen - Continued) <br />k I <br />r'' <br />Jabbour indicated that this would require a 4/5th majority vote by Council and could not <br />be reviewec until December 8 when a full Council would be in attendance. <br />Stoddard moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2314 for ctmstruction of a <br />duplex amending this single lot zoning to include duplex credit approvals ior construction <br />within 250 ’ from B-3 building due to its legal non-conforming use. <br />McMillan questioned whether the property was more than 250 ’ from the B-3 zoning. <br />The number of docks (3) and their length (25') were noted. They are located adjacent to <br />the neighboring property and allows people to walk across the outlet. Stoddard noted that <br />the motion would allow the applicant and Staff to see what can be done before review at <br />the 12/8 Council meeUng. McMillan noted that LMCD approval would be required for <br />moving the docks. <br />It was noted that the language as it currently exists in the ordinance needs to be narrowed <br />and limited to the B-3. <br />Stoddard said there may be no need for an amendment as he feels the distance is less than <br />previously thought. <br />Stoddard amended his motion to eliminate the existing language in the code regarding <br />duplex credit. McMillan seconded the amendment to the motion. <br />Lindquist questioned how the Commission could get duplex zoning back m place with <br />this motion. It would require Comprehensive Plan review and changes made. <br />Lindquist said the motion would allow this application to go forward but additional work <br />would be required. <br />Hawn questioned whether the motion could legally be done noting the current rights of <br />the propert}' owners. Van Zomeren said the public notice posted would serve as noUce <br />for this motion. <br />The motion was separated into two motions. <br />The motion read: to approve Application #2314 for construction of a duplex and amend <br />the single lot zoning to include the duplex credit approval for construction within 250 ot <br />the B-3 zoning district due to its legal non-conforming use. Vote: Ayes 3, McMillan, <br />Stoddard, Berg; Nays 2, Lindquist, Hawn. Motion passed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.