Laserfiche WebLink
ANALYSIS <br />Lot Area and Yards <br />LR-IB District Standards <br />Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside <br />1 acre 140'35'10'75' and ALS <br />Subject Property Lot Area and Yards <br />Lot Area Lot Width Street Yard Side Yard Lakeside <br />26,261 sq. ft. <br />.60 acres <br />50'185' to house <br />75' to garage <br />Pool is on property line. <br />Shed is 3' off from north <br />property line. <br />110' to pool <br />The existing residence was built in 1968. At that time, the building permit did not reference any <br />swimming pool. The residence was constructed at 6.35' from the south property line. The timber <br />window well also encroaches into the required side yard. <br />There is a ravine along the south property line that may qualify as a bluff. The City’s topographical <br />map shows significant change in elevation The house was built prior to the adoption of the <br />shorelnnd ordinance. The pool and deck may be located in the top of bluff setback. <br />In May 1976 a 24' x 40' i 960 sq. fl.) garage was constructed on the property, 10' from the north <br />property line. According to the current zoning code, an accessory structure that exceeds 750 sq. ft. <br />shall be located no less than 15' from the property line. The street file and permit record do not <br />indicate when the shed was built. The shed does not meet the side yard setback requirement. <br />In 1976 it was determined that the swimming pool was constructed in 1972 and was built without <br />a permit. At that time, the survey indicated that the setback was 1.1' for the deck and 8' for the <br />house. The owners were required to obtain a side yard variance. <br />The current swimming pool does not meet the required 30' setback for oversized accessor}' structures <br />that e.xceed 1,000 sq. ft. <br />The applicant requested a vacation of Forest Boulevard in 1988. The applicant was required to <br />combine the lots into one parcel. In 1996 the applicant applied for permits to build a retaining wall <br />in the lakeshore yard and along the north property line. The current survey shows a portion of the <br />retaining wall on the adjacent property. However, the applicant has provided information that <br />indicates that the vacated portion of Oak Place has been reconfigured by court action in 1994. <br />U2366 Peter Lartpher <br />1359 Park Drive <br />Date ofP.C. May 18. 1998 <br />page—2