Laserfiche WebLink
< • <br />f <br />#2340 - Robert & Iris Waade <br />May 21,1998 <br />Page 3 <br />location of the road within Outlot A has been shifted to the west side of the Outlot, leaving a 17 <br />setback to the adjacent garage structure. <br />Outlot B does not meet the 30' width requirement and requires a variance, and use of Outlot B to <br />serve as access to all three units does not meet code standards. At least one of the units must have <br />its access other than Outlot B or a variance would be necessary. It appears that this can be <br />accomplished without causing a hardcover overage. Also, Oultlot B does not extend to the defined <br />rear (south) line of Lot 1, creating a 'flag' lot which requires a variance per Section 11.31 Subd. 5C. <br />Outlot C is being provided at the request of Hennepin County Public Works for needed sight <br />distance improvements and added right-of-way at this location. The hill along North Shore Drive <br />needs to be cut down to provide adequate sight distance. This excavation would be the responsibility <br />of the developer. <br />Grading & Drainage Plan <br />The revised grading plan was submitted prior to the road relocation and duplex size reduction, and <br />does not reflect those changes. This most current grading plan has been reviewed by the City <br />Engineer, and his comments appear in Exhibit C, summarized as follows: <br />1. If pond reaches overflow elevation (i.e. if normal outlet pipe is plugged or a huge <br />storm hits) it will overflow eastward, affecting neighboring properties. This should <br />(and probably can) be revised to avoid such routing. <br />2. The grading plan reduces potential surface storm ponding for easterly lots, hence <br />while total area draining to east is reduced, its storage potential is also reduced. A <br />greater concern is that if stormwater from the east overflowed into this property prior <br />to this development, it will now be blocked. This issue needs further detailed <br />review before the drainage plans can be approved. It is likely that an analysis of the <br />immediate watershed is necessary. <br />t <br />3. A revised grading and drainage plan reflecting the road nnd duplex changes should <br />be submitted. Some pond outlet details are needed. <br />Staff and the city Engineer are scheduled to meet with the applicant on V .y 26 to review grading <br />and drainage issues. <br />Berm <br />The grading plan proposes a berm approximately 2-3' above existing grades and 15' in vddth along <br />the west lot line abutting Lakeside Marina. At the Planning Commis.«ic" meeting on May 18, <br />HIM il