My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:21:33 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:15:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
File #2340 <br />February 3,1998 <br />Page 4 <br />Total area of 75-250' zones in Lot 2 = 532 sf + 12,248 sf = 12,780 sf 25%-3,195 sf <br />Sfav^rau ™ ^ sf (CsedU «o 250-500' zone) <br />Total area of 250-500' zone in Lot 2 = 9,000 sf 30% = 2,700 sf <br />Add credit from 75-250'zone: 2,700 sf+2,295 sf= 4,995 sf <br />Cored 250-500' hardcover = 4,500 sf, which is less than 4,995 sf hence the proposal <br />should be considered as meeting the intent of the hardcover ordinance. <br />Outlot B meets the 30' width tequireraent; however, use of Outlot B to serve as access to all three <br />Site^es not meet code standards as noted above. At least one of the umts must have its <br />Other than Outlot B or a variance would be necessary. <br />0„tlnt A is being plaited as a private road. Outlot A currently contains a narrow gravel dnyeway <br />Of Outlot A The City Engineer has correctly noted that the City's road stanaara app icamc lu <br />A C 24 pC wTdth for up to seven units. Since applicant does not control the remammg <br />properties whicii would be served b; <br />sac, but it is reasonable in staffs opinion to require tn< <br />„roCesv£7w::M it may be unreasonable to force him to create a cul-de- <br />Hennepin County Public Works viewed the proposed private road <br />Januar^ The hill along North Shore Drive needs to be cut down to provide adeqmte sigh *sUnc-^ <br />This excavation would occur potentially within the County road nght-of-way ^d within Lot 2. <br />^*e res^Sility of the devdoper. Hennepin County's written comments had not been received <br />as of this writing. <br />General Comments and Issues <br />1 No Etading or drainage plans for the site has been submitted, but is requited, -me Ci^ <br />■ Engfnrer hL iked JstLwater ponding for this site, although MCWD has considered it <br />to be exempt due to the size of the site <br />2.Both proposed buildings appear to avoid existing sewer lines by at least 15'. The survey <br />must STurility JcJL of record-, no easement are shown on die current prehmin^. <br />plat drawing.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.