My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:21:33 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:15:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />TO:Chair Smith and Orono Planning Commission Members <br />Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br />FROM: Michael P, Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br />DATE:April 17,1998 <br />SUBJECT: #2340 Robert and Iris Waade, 3280/3290 North Shore Drive - Preliminar>* Plat <br />Review - Continuation of Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: LR-lC-1, Single Family Lakcshore Residential, 1/2 acre, Sewered <br />Total Site Area:1.503 acres <br />Proposal: Two-lot residential plat to create a single family lakeshore lot and a duplex lot <br />near the road. The lakeshore lot is a back lot and subject to the pertinent standards. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Revised preliminary plat drawing (?) NOT RECEIVED AS OF 4-17 2:00 PM <br />B - Preliminary grading and drainage plan (?) NOT RECEIVED AS OF 4-17 2:00 PM <br />C - City Engineer Comments 3-19-98 <br />D - Resident Petition Submitted 3-16-98 <br />E - Notice of Planning Commission Action 3-17-98 <br />F - Staff concept sketch of PRD incorporating adjacent Dunn lo. <br />G - Memo and Exhibits of 3-13-98 <br />New Information Since March 16 Meeting <br />Applicant submitted grading plans on March 12, too late for the City Engineer to review them piior <br />to the March 16 meeting. The City Engineer reviewed those plans on March 19 (See Exhibit C) and <br />his comments w^'re forwarded to the applicant on April 2. Staff met with the applicant on April 2 <br />and discussed options including the possibility of doing a PPJD rather than the proposed standard <br />plat; and how the plan might be revised if additional properties were added to the mix._ ., <br />Applicant also noted he may choose to combine the lots and begin constructing a single reside.nce <br />on the site this spring (if all 4 lots are combined the result will be a conforming building site) and <br />take his chances with a subdivision in the future. <br />Revised plans were expected to be submitted today, Friday, April 17, but are not in hand as of this <br />writing, and neither staff nor the City Engineer have had sufficient opportunity to react to them if <br />they are included in the packet. <br />J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.