My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:21:33 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:15:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
#2340 - Robert & Iris Waade <br />May 15, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />Analysis of Most Current Submittal <br />Latl is a lakeshore lot that is proposed for a single family residence. As a back lot: <br />It meets the "150% of 1/2 acre" back lot area standard when the stormwater pond <br />easement is included per Planning Commission's direction on March 16 (0.75 acres <br />required, 0.79 acre proposed). <br />It meets the LR-1 C-1 100' minimum width standard (124' at the shoreline, at the 75' <br />setback line, and at the street yard setback). <br />It meets the required 45' street yard ^epth (150% of the 30' LR-lC-1 standard). <br />It meets the required 15' side jad depth (150% of the 10' LR-lC-1 standard). <br />It meets the required lake setback of 75'. <br />Avergpg getbapk is not an issue, since the proposed residence is further from the lake <br />than the residence to the east, and there is no residence to the west. <br />The ac,ceg$ Qq(lQ( (Outlot B) at a 20' width requires a variance to the 30' minimum <br />width requirement; the driveway m i .-. the required 10' setback from the east lot line <br />per Section 10.03, Subd 27 (C) (3), but not from the west line abutting Lot 2, hence <br />a variance is required here. <br />Hardcover for Lot 1 is proposed at just under the 25% limit in the 75-250' zone and <br />at 25% in the small portion in the 250-500' zone where 30% is allowed; but the <br />narrow (10') driveway proposal still has a minimal apron at the garage which may be <br />difficult to maneuver, suggesting that at final site planning a more flexible layout <br />may be desired. <br />is technically a "front lot" and in this case is proposed for construction of a duplex, i.e. a single <br />building with two dwelling units, on a single lot. Under Orono's ordinances this duplex lot could <br />not be split to have two separate owmers. The result is that at least one of the units will be a rental, <br />and/or possibly both will be rental. Regarding lot standards: <br />Lot 2 meets the 0.50 acre minimum lot size required for a non-riparian duplex lot, tlie <br />same standard applicable for a single family lot.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.