05-26-1998 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#2365 - Sketch Plan May 11, 1998 Page 4 An existing shed on Lot 1 would have to be removed as a condition of subdivision approval since it becomes an accessory structure without a principal structure. Only Lot 2 would have lake access via Outlot B of Burger’s Bayside Addition. Lot 1 would not be allowed lake access because Outlot B is only 122' in width. A covenant would be filed with this subdivision indicating no lake access easement can be created in favor of Lot 1. The subdivision would be subject to park dedication of either 8% of the land or a park fee of 8% of the fair market value of Lot 1. If the value of Lot 1 exceeds $61,250, the park fee would be capped at $4,900 per City ordinance. If the City ultimately approved this proposal, a sewer connection charge of $14,665 (1998 fee schedule) would be due at final plat approval. Staff Recommendation Approval of the lot area variance for this new subdivision would be inconsistent with the City s past practice and is not recommended. There arc no unique circumstances here, and no hardship making it impossible to use the land, since the land is being used for an existing residence. Approval of the lot width variance is a secondary issue. The City has granted lot width variances for subdivisions where additional land is lacking but a home can be built that meets all setback requirements. If the lot area issue could be resolved, a lot width variance might be justifiable. One option for applirant to consider is to sell a portion of the proDertV to an abutting pvvT^gr, whiqh would require a T ot T.ine Rearrangement. This might allow applicant to retrieve.Sp me valup frQm the excess land while making an adjacent property more conforming to lot area Standards^ Planning Commission Direction Requested This is a sketch plan request which doesn't require formal action, but the applicant does need direction as to whether Plamiing Commission will recommend the granting of a lot area variance in order for this subdivision to occur. If not, would you recommend the alternative of a lot line rearrangement with a neighboring property? This item will be presented to Council on May 26 if applicant so requests, or if Plamiing Commission recommends in favor of the area variance.