My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
05-26-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 2:21:33 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 2:15:22 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
548
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n <br />TO:Michael P.Gaffron, Senior Planning Coordinator <br />FROM: Stephen Weckman, On-Site Systems Manager <br />DATE: April 8,1998 <br />SUBJECT: Septic Review for Application #2355, Susan and Douglas Van Moorlehem <br />Subdivision <br />The proposed four lot subdivision requires the use of on-site sewage treatment systems. Soil borings <br />and percolation tests were performed by S-P Testing, Inc. to identily primary and alternate drainfield <br />sites on each lot. <br />The existing three bedroom residence on lot 1, block 1 requires two future drainfield sites for the <br />subdivision as the existing system is non-compliant. The existing system must be repaired by <br />December 31, 2007 or within 90 days of failure, whichever comes first. The proposed primary site <br />is located just down slope of the driveway and excavated soils and is designed for the existing three <br />bedroom residence. Additional area is available for a total of five bedrooms, but the system would <br />be seven feet from the driveway and the upslope side of the system would lie over excavated soils. <br />If a five bedroom system Is installed in this location the driveway would need to be moved to provide <br />adequate drainage around the system. The future drainfield site meets all current codes. Because the <br />proposed primary drainfield site for this lot has some limitations, staff notes that another future site <br />appears to be avaUable just east of the future site, but at slightly steeper slopes (between 6 and 8 <br />percent). Staff considers this to be a better alternative than using a site across Watertown Rd. <br />The remaining lots have primary and alternate drainfield sites designed for five bedroom residences <br />wliich meet all current standards. No setback, drainage or other site problems appear to be a concern <br />on these lots. <br />Based on the above information, staff recommends approval of the subdivision. The City requires <br />the drainfield sites be fenced off prior to any grading or land alteration on these lots. ----
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.