Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON MARCH 16,1998 <br />(U2 - #2340 Robert Waade - Continued) <br />Mabusth asked what other variances would be required. Gaffron reported that lot width <br />would be required unless the lot line along the road outlot was defined as the fi'ont lot line <br />instead of CoRd 51. There would be no need for a hardcover variance if credit was given <br />for the ponding. The variances necessary would be for the length and width of the outlot. <br />Berg said it was important to note that the driveways would still be located there whether <br />one unit or two. <br />Jody Dalvey said she would like to r .e the area cleaned up She believes people would be <br />less apt to buy property in the area if a duplex was allowed. She acknowledged that her <br />primary concern is with the duplex. <br />Berg felt the main issues have been addressed. <br />Smith suggested tabling the application to allow the applicant to redesign the project. <br />Waade asked if the Commission would support the duplex proposal if the footprint was <br />reduced. Smith felt the main issue was with reducing the structural coverage. She noted <br />support was voiced for the variance for the driveway. Smith informed Waade of the need <br />to submit a drainage plan for review. She emphasized that lake access would only be <br />allowed to the single family residence. <br />Stoddard said he supported the Staff recommendations noted on page 6 of the memo <br />noting the property is zoned for duplex. He supported the driveway and lot width <br />variance and structural coverage of 15%. He suggested the applicant work with staff <br />Smith noted the applicant also needs to protect the adjacent property in regards to <br />drainage as part of the grading plan. <br />Marfield reminded the Commission of Lindquist's comments. Smith informed Marfield <br />that Lindquist was speaking for himself She noted that the plan as proposed would most <br />likely be denied if a recommendation was made at this time. Smith informed the applicant <br />that the Commission needs to see the revised plan before review by Council. <br />Smith moved, Berg seconded, to table Application ##2340. Vole: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(Agenda item #3 follows item #5.)