My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:59:00 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:53:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING COUNCILMEETINQ <br />MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 17, 1998 <br />mar 9 1998 <br />ROLL cnnr'CF ORONO <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with the following members <br />present: Chair Dale Lindquist, Sandra Smith, Janice Berg, William Stoddard, and Lili <br />McMillan. Charles Schroeder and Elizabeth Hawn were absent. Mayor Jabbour and <br />Council Member Peterson were present. The following represented the City Staff: Senior <br />Planning Coordinator Michael Gaffron, City Planner Elizabeth Van Zomeren, Planning <br />Intern Brad Dressier, and Recorder Sherry Frost. Chair Lindquist called the meeting to <br />order at 6:34 p.m. <br />OLD BUSINESS; CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />(#1) #2312 CLAUS WEILER AND RENEE MEERKINS, 1135 NORTH ARM <br />DRIVE - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT \M FH VARIANCES - 6:34-6:41 P.M. <br />The Applicants were present. <br />Dressier reported that the application is for variances to rebuild a previously existing deck <br />and an additional garage. The application was tabled at the January meeting to enable to <br />the applicants to determine the size of the previous decks. Staff had been unaware that <br />decks had previously existed on the residence. The variances and a CUP are required due <br />to the accessory structure being placed in front of the principal structure and the lot being <br />considered a through lot. The proposed decks require street and bluff setback variances. <br />The Planning Commission had requested the accessory structure be reduced in size to <br />meet the 1000 s f maximum footprint allowed. I he structure is now proposed at 968 s.f. <br />The proposed accessory structure meets the side setback of 10’ as requested by the <br />Commission and will be located 33' from the side lot line. <br />The decks are proposed to extend 8' from the rear of the residence towards Elmwood <br />Avenue and the bluff The proposed decks are smaller in size that had existed. Another <br />change to the plan is the proposal that the garage be 1-1/2 stories, rather than one story. <br />The structure would meet height requirements. <br />Dressier said Staff recommended approval of the CUP for locating an accessory structure <br />on a through lot and locating an accessory structure in front of the principal stnicture for <br />the garage Staff also recommens approval of bluff setback and street setback variances <br />for the decks. Staff recommended the shed be located to a conforming location or <br />removed. The applicants have agreed to remove the shed if approval is received for the <br />accessory structure. <br />The applicant said he agreed with Staff’s recommendation. <br />There were no public comments.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.