My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:59:00 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:53:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO Cm' COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON FEBRUARY 23, 1998 <br />(#8 - #2326 Orono Development - Continued) <br />Kelley asked what the elevation difference was between the driving lane and the gas <br />station. Sepena said the difference was about 3'. <br />Jabbour did not believe the green space along the parking to the rear could be reduced. <br />Goetten said she would like to see improvements made in Navarre and supported the <br />development. Goetten based her support of the 5' setback on the importance of <br />providing the parking space required. She felt any improvements to CoRu 19 would <br />likely be far in the future. <br />Cook suggested a possible reduction in the green space by the retaining wall. However, <br />the retaining wall would have to be designed stronger to accommodate the reduction <br />resulting in a costly expense to the applicant. Gaffron noted that the applicant has been <br />requested to design the area to include green space in order to disguise the retaining wall <br />Sepena added that any reduction in green space would add to the height of the retaining <br />wall as there would be less area to accommodate the slope of the land. <br />Jabbour said he felt it was a good project and agreed with concerns and opinions given. <br />Peterson asked if there were other B-5 District areas affected by this front parking <br />setback. Gaffron showed the three B-5 locations. There is also a 20' setback <br />requirement for the B-1 District located across the street from the subject property. <br />Peterson asked if any of the properties have a 20' setback. Gaffron noted that Lowells <br />Auto Parts approached the 20' requirement, other sites probably did not. <br />Barrett asked how a building material facade variance can be accomplished. He asked <br />what the hardship would be for the variance. Gaffron read the code. It stipulated that <br />building material could be approved by Council. He said it could be argued that a <br />variance was not necessary if Council approval was granted. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Application #2326 for commercial site plan <br />review and variances for 500-1000' zone hardcover and parking setback. The building <br />material as indicated is approved by Council and falls within the stated code section. <br />Staff was directed to d. ift the resolution detailing all conditions and findings for <br />presentation at the March 9 Council meeting. Staff was directed to follow through on the <br />vacation of Navarre Lane. <br />Vote; Ayes 3, Nays 1, Peterson <br />13
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.