My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1998
>
03-09-1998 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2024 1:59:00 PM
Creation date
6/5/2024 1:53:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
407
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />I <br />3 <br />i I <br />it <br />. <br />r <br />#2341 - Dan Anderson <br />March 6, 1998 <br />Page 3 <br />reviewed by Planning Commission at a public hearing on Februaiy' 17. Planning Commission <br />recommended as follows: <br />1. Approval of lot width variances for Lots 2 & 3. <br />Acceptance of proposed access for Lot 7; all existing accesses to Old Crystal Bay <br />Road shall be eliminated. <br />3.Approve private road radius of 125' as proposed due to septic site impacts if a <br />conforming radius is required. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Applicant to grant a 15' trail easement along easterly boundary of property, <br />Applicant to develop stormwater ponding or provide a letter from MCWD re: <br />ponding. <br />6.No bluff impact variances will be granted; revise grading, etc. for Lots 5 & 6 to be <br />conforming. <br />7.Applicant to grant a tree/woodland/natural vegetation preservation easement <br />specifically for the areas abutting Maxwell Bay. <br />8. Adherence to normal development requirements. <br />Stormwater/Drainage/Grading Plan <br />At this time, applicant has not proposed any stormwater ponding on site. The City Engineer has <br />recommended that stormwater ponding be provided for this site. This also needs MCWD review. <br />The City has consistently required stormwater ponds for this type and magnitude of residential <br />development, and developer has provided staff with virtually no strong basis to suggest that it is not <br />needed for this site. <br />It appears to staff that drainage from the private road and a portion of the east half of the property <br />could be directed to a pond that could be developed near the entamce of the private road. <br />Development of such a pond might result in lot areas being somewhat smaller, since the City does <br />not credit stormwater ponding easements toward dr>’ buildable lot area. <br />1-1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.